Billionaires Beware: Sanders, Warren Wealth Taxes Aim to Thin Your Ranks

Bernie Sanders Social Security

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Image credit: © Sheila Fitzgerald | Dreamstime.com

Bernie Sanders says “billionaires should not exist,” and fewer will exist if the wealth tax proposal the liberal Senator and presidential candidate unveiled Sept. 24 were ever to come to fruition.

Yes, the “super-rich” may become merely the “pretty rich” if Sanders (I-VT) and fellow liberal presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) get their way.

While the U.S. has never had a “wealth tax,” the two candidates, who along with Joe Biden are of course the leading contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination, see implementing one as a way to combat the issue of wealth inequality in America while generating huge tax revenues for the federal government.

Meanwhile, frontrunner Biden, as an alternative to his own wealth tax, is rumored to be considering proposing a new tax on Wall Street which would target financial transactions such as the sale of stocks and bonds, per a Sept. 26 article in The Washington Post. Such a proposal would likely generate only a fraction of the revenues compared to the Warren and Sanders wealth tax proposals.

The mere prospect of a wealth tax has naturally alarmed the business world as well as conservatives and more-centrist Democrats. If either proposal were to become real, it would certainly face legal challenges as being unconstitutional and could be struck down by the courts.

The world’s two leading academic advocates of wealth taxation, University of California-Berkeley economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, who have worked with both Sanders and Warren on their proposals, published an analysis of them on Sept. 22. It found that the Warren wealth tax would raise $200 billion (in 2019) while the Sanders wealth tax would raise $335 billion (in 2019), or $135 billion (68%) more than the Warren wealth tax.

Dueling wealth taxes

Elizabeth Warren

Warren’s “Ultra-Millionaire Tax” calls for a 2% annual tax on households with a net worth between $50 million and $1 billion and a 3% annual tax on households with a net worth over $1 billion.

She uses the following example to help make her case for a wealth tax:

“Consider two people: an heir with $500 million in yachts, jewelry, and fine art, and a teacher with no savings in the bank. If both the heir and the teacher bring home $50,000 in labor income next year, they would pay the same amount in federal taxes, despite their vastly different circumstances. Increasing income taxes won’t address this problem. That’s why we need a tax on wealth.”

Warren’s campaign says the Ultra-Millionaire Tax would apply only to roughly the wealthiest 75,000 households, or the top 0.1%. “Because wealth is so concentrated, Saez and Zucman project that this small tax on roughly 75,000 households will bring in $2.75 trillion in revenue over a ten-year period.”

Still, for those families, just figuring out how much they owe will be difficult, likened to having to file an “annual estate tax return.”

Sanders’ more aggressive wealth tax proposal claims (per Saez and Zucman’s analysis) “the wealth of billionaires would be cut in half over 15 years” relative to a situation with no wealth tax, and is much more punitive to the “richest of the rich” than Warren’s tax.

“We are going to take on the billionaire class, substantially reduce wealth inequality in America and stop our democracy from turning into a corrupt oligarchy,” Sanders said of his plan in a statement.

His tax reaches more households (estimated at 180,000) than Warren’s and takes a larger bite out of their assets, according to analysis by Saez and Zucman.

“We estimate that Sanders’ wealth tax would raise $4.35 trillion over a decade and fully eliminate the gap between wealth growth for billionaires and wealth growth for the middle class,” Saez and Zucman say.

Under the Sanders proposal, the tax rate would start at 1% of net worth from $32 to $50 million, increase to 2% on net worth from $50 to $250 million, 3% from $250 to $500 million, 4% from $500 million to $1 billion, 5% from $1 to $2.5 billion, 6% from $2.5 to $5 billion, 7% from $5 to $10 billion, and 8% on wealth over $10 billion (the brackets apply for married taxpayers and are halved for singles).

Average it out, and America’s billionaires would initially be paying about a 6% average tax rate, Saez and Zucman conclude. The economists previously found that a wealth tax rate on U.S. billionaires of 6.25% would maximize revenue generation for the government.

By the numbers

Here are a few more interesting statistics about income inequality and wealth tax proposals, taken largely from Saez and Zucman’s findings:

Care to add your 2 cents on the wealth tax proposals? Please do so using comment tool below!

Exit mobile version