Why Decrease In 401(k) Revenue Sharing is Good, and Bad

Be careful what 401(k) participants wish for ...

Be careful what 401(k) participants wish for ...

Little surprise, 401(k)-consulting giant NEPC finds revenue sharing agreements on the wane, as fixed-dollar agreements with service providers rise in the wake of the DOL’s fiduciary rule.

“Plan sponsors continue to look for ways to promote fairness and transparency,” Ross Bremen, a partner and NEPC’s Defined Contribution Strategist, said in a statement. “The majority of plans in our survey are now contracted on a fixed dollar basis. While most plans still have some level of revenue sharing, we are seeing plans of all sizes looking for ways to reduce reliance on it.”

However, he cautions that the current “race to the bottom” in terms of fee reductions isn’t necessarily all good, noting that at some point service and innovation could suffer, something that is not in the participants’ best interests.

According to Bremen and the organization:

“The lifetime income figure is one to watch,” Bremen added. “There is no question that it is taking time for sponsors to get comfortable with the current solutions, but the plan sponsor has become much more engaged with their employees’ DC options in the last decade-plus, and we predict this trend will continue.”

Exit mobile version