Group Warns on ‘Cost of Doing Nothing’ About Social Security

Social Security cost of doing nothing

Image credit: © Lane Erickson | Dreamstime.com


In less than 10 years, Social Security’s Old Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund is likely to be depleted, at which point, all beneficiaries would see a significant cut in payments.

The Peter G. Peterson Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to increasing public awareness of the nature and urgency of key fiscal challenges threatening America’s future and to accelerating action on them, is sounding the alarm on “the cost of doing nothing” to shore up the program with an updated report released on Nov. 27.

Graphic credit: Peter G. Peterson Foundation

The organization warns that within the next decade, 70 million Americans will be in the OASI program, yet continued inaction threatens its viability. According to the most recent Trustees report, choosing to stay the course and do nothing to shore up Social Security for another decade would necessitate payroll tax increases or benefit cuts about one-fifth higher than if the Congress acted today. As the depletion of the Trust Fund gets closer, the program will require increasingly large adjustments to maintain scheduled benefits.

“With just 9 years to go before benefits are indiscriminately cut, now is the time for lawmakers to take action, shore up the Social Security Trust Fund for the long term, and guarantee the future of the safety net that so many rely upon,” the report concludes.

By law, Social Security can only pay retirement benefits to the extent that the balance in the trust fund is positive. In 2023, the income of the program covered about 89% of the benefits paid, while the trust funds’ reserves covered the remaining 11%. In the years ahead, that reserve balance will dwindle, and the Social Security Board of Trustees anticipates the depletion of the OASI trust fund in 2033.

At that point, benefits would be automatically reduced to match incoming revenues, equal to a 21 percent reduction in payments to all 70 million individuals who would qualify for OASI. The Trustees project that benefits over the rest of the 75-year projection period would represent about 73% of the amount scheduled under current law.

What would this cut mean for Americans? The report offers two examples:

Graphic credit: Peter G. Peterson Foundation

What if Social Security tax is eliminated?

President-elect Trump said repeatedly during his 2024 candidacy that if elected, he would end the tax on Social Security benefits, as well as ending taxes on tips and overtime.

If the tax on Social Security benefits were to end without an offset, a recent estimate by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) found that the Social Security Trust Fund insolvency window would shrink to only six years.

And instead of 23% reduction in benefits in 2035 forecast by the Congressional Budget Office back in August (which would mean a $16,500 cut facing a typical couple retiring just before insolvency), Trump’s agenda being enacted would also bump it up to a 33% across-the-board cut to all benefits, according to the analysis released in October.

If enacted today, a 33% benefit cut would mean that the average 2024 monthly Social Security benefit check of $1,907 would be reduced by $629 per month to $1,278.

“President Trump’s proposals to eliminate taxation of Social Security benefits, end taxes on tips and overtime, impose tariffs, and expand deportations would all widen Social Security’s cash deficits,” the CRFB report said.

SEE ALSO:

• Second Trump Presidency: End of Tax on Social Security Benefits?

• Trump Social Security Plan Would Hike Benefit Cuts, Speed Up Insolvency: CRFB Analysis

• Growing Number of Adults Urge Congress to Address Social Security Insolvency

Exit mobile version