House Members Working on Bipartisan Alternative to DOL Proposal

Congress proposes an alternative to the DOL 401(k) fiduciary rule.

Congress prepares to introduce an alternative to the DOL 401(k) fiduciary rule.

More trouble on the DOL fiduciary front (or not, depending on your perspective). A group of lawmakers in the House of Representatives outlined an alternative on Thursday to the DOL’s proposed fiduciary rule that they say “will help strengthen the retirement security of working families and ensure retirement advisors protects their clients’ best interests.”

The bipartisan group is still in the concepting stage, but says the initiative grew from a fear that the DOL’s proposal will make it harder for low- and middle-income families to plan for retirement.

The members—which include Representatives Peter Roskam (R-IL), Richard Neal (D-MA), Phil Roe (R-TN), and Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM)—are working together to introduce a bipartisan legislative that they say reflects the following principles:

The members also released the following statement:

We are concerned that the Department of Labor’s current fiduciary proposal may have unintended negative consequences that could harm individuals and families saving for retirement. We acknowledge the Department of Labor’s pledge to change aspects of the regulation before final issuance, but feel more must be done to adequately address concerns about the rule’s impact on the ability of low- and middle-class families to save for retirement. 

“The Department of Labor has said it will change certain aspects of the regulation before final issuance. However, if the final rule has flaws, damage can be done upon the rule’s release due to the immediate changes the retirement savings industry would have to make and the likelihood that those changes could limit access to services and education for those saving for retirement. To protect the retirement savings of all Americans, we intend to introduce a bipartisan legislative solution.  

“Our legislative proposal will ensure that all Americans have access to the financial advice they need to prepare for retirement, protect individuals from conflicted advice, and require advisors serve the best interests of retirement savers. We look forward to the work that lies ahead and urge all our colleagues to join this important effort.”

Exit mobile version