Weekend Wackiness: Lottery Retirement Plans, Dave Ramsey Fanatics and More

Millennials, lottery, retirement

Many Millennials betting on winning lottery to cover retirement?

Time for some more Friday 401(k) Fun with another roundup of the absurd and offbeat, courtesy of a few recent news items that should be of at least peripheral interest to 401k advisors—and just might raise an eyebrow.

60% of Millennials think winning the lottery is a solid retirement strategy

File this under “things that make you smack your own forehead.”

According to a new survey conducted by consumer investing app STASH on attitudes toward investing, approximately 40% of U.S. consumers—and nearly 6 in 10 Millennials—say winning the lottery could be a good retirement bet.

STASH partnered with Propeller Insights for an online survey of 1,156 respondents in March which found the disturbing responses.

“Playing the lottery may be fun, but it’s the opposite of a safe bet,” said Brandon Krieg, co-founder and CEO of Stash, in a statement (of the obvious). “Instead of crossing their fingers and hoping their lottery jackpot dreams come true, people can take concrete steps to improve their finances.”

Of course, a person has a better chance of having any of the following happening to them than they do of winning the lottery:

Yeah, good luck with the lottery strategy.

be killed by a vending machine

  • be attacked by a shark
  • be elected President of the U.S.
  • give birth to identical quadruplets
  • be diagnosed with the plague
  • survive a plane crash
  • be killed by a falling coconut
  • be declared a saint
  • be killed by an asteroid or meteorite impact
  • be killed by a hippopotamus
  • This particular survey found 76% of Millennials said they live paycheck-to-paycheck. Nearly half of survey respondents said they would start building retirement nest eggs if they had more knowledge about how and where to invest, and more than one third said access to free, high-quality advice would be an incentive for them to invest.

    Yeah, it sounds like they really, really need more knowledge if they think winning the lottery is a solid strategy for funding retirement.

    Among all respondents not dependent on a lottery-win retirement, 22% plan to spend their retirement working a part-time job, 4% hope to find cheaper living abroad, another 4% will depend on their children, and 3% will look for a rich spouse to support them.

    Broke Millennials flock to Dave Ramsey?

    Millennials like Ramsey’s advice on slashing debt.

    Dave Ramsey, who advises people not to contribute to a 401(k) until all their debts are paid off, is on the cover of the May 2019 issue of Moneymagazine, with a headline that calls him “The Debt Slasher,” and asks the question of whether his advice is sound.

    From the articleToday, Ramsey’s core advice is driven by the seven “baby steps” he devised after digging himself out of that hole [almost lost everything in the mid-80s, which is explained earlier in the article]. You start with a $1,000 emergency fund and then throw all your discretionary income into paying off your debts—no saving for retirement, no eating out, no shopping for things you don’t absolutely need—until you’re in the clear.

    While most of the article focuses on stories of Millennials following his advice to get out of debt (and avoid college debt), there is only minor mention of retirement advice.

    Still, there were quite a few eye-opening stats gleaned from the article:

    Where the rich are richer

    Greenwich, Conn., sports plenty of Top 1%ers.

    According to financial website GOBankingRates, most people consider the top 5% and 1% of earners in any given state to be rich. “You might be surprised to learn, however, that there’s a vast discrepancy between the 5-percenters in one state as compared with some others,” says a recent piece on the site, referring to its rankings of “How Much You Need to be in the Top 5% in Every State.”

    The site used data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2017 American Community Survey and the Economic Policy Institute’s income inequality report to determine the average income for each state and Washington, D.C.

    So where are the rich richest?

    Where the rich are poorer?

    Does an advisor need a big, fancy office?

    How important is having a fancy office?

    The debate rages on…

    Watched a short video from MM1 Collective (a training program for financial advisors) on the topic this week featuring financial advisor Jason Wenk, who leads Retirement Wealth Advisors, Inc., and FormulaFolio Investments.

    Although he has a big, fancy office for his companies, which he founded in Grand Rapids, Mich., where about 60 people work, he has since moved to California and does most of his work from his home, allowing him to spend much more time with his family and pursuing other interests.

    According to a 2017 Inc. 5000 piece, Wenk doesn’t shave, shower or commute most days (his company also has an outpost in San Juan Capistrano, Calif.), but cutting out those monotonous time-sucking things helped him grow his company.

    “In fact, I had my best year ever as a practicing financial advisor, almost $70 million of business while working from home, and really only probably working only 20 hours or less per week,” Wenk says in the video.

    “If it works for you, make sure you do it,” Wenk says of the need for a big, fancy office. “Is it necessary? Absolutely not.”

    Fancy office or no fancy office: What do you think? Please share your opinion by using the Disqus comment tool below.

    Exit mobile version