Clear, Confusing? Public Perception of Auto Enrollment, Escalation

401k, auto enrollment, retirement plan, behavioral economics

What are they thinking?

The “auto” revolution (enrollment, deferral, escalation) in 401k and similar retirement plans is widely regarded as one of the most important innovations recently in saving and investing.

Indeed, it’s received academic and even Nobel Prize-winning validation from Richard Thaler, Shlomo Benartzi and other behavioral economist and experts, leading to better outcomes overall.

And now a new study of DC participant counterparts in the defined benefit space finds that it’s getting through to the general public as well.

The survey from the Center for State and Local Government Excellence and ICMA-RC reveals that nearly half of state and local employees approve of auto-enrollment in defined contribution plans and 77 percent would choose to stay in a plan if auto-enrolled.

The research also finds that among those who would stay in the plan, higher default deferral rates result in respondents settling on a higher contribution rate.

The survey assesses public employee perceptions of auto-enrollment and the impact of varying default deferral rates on an employee’s likelihood to stay in the plan.

It also examines the attitudes and behaviors of public sector employees regarding retirement savings, their progress toward financial security, and issues driving their plan participation.

Key findings

Other report key findings are as follows:

Exit mobile version