ERISA 3(38) and 3(21)—What’s the Difference?

401k, retirement, ERISA, 3(38), fiduciary

It's VERY important.

Is it surprising or scary that too many 401k advisors are still unfamiliar with ERISA terms like 3(38), 3(21) and 3(16)?

Probably both.

It’s a reason a session dedicated to the topic drew so much interest at That 401(k) Conference at Coors Field in Denver Friday morning.

Hosted by ERISA attorney Ary Rosenbaum and presented by Lyle Himebaugh of Granite Group Advisors, it explained the key differences between a 3(21) and 3(38) advisor.

More specifically:

3(21) Co-Fiduciary – “Help me”

3(38) Investment Fiduciary – “Do it for me”

Referring to a 2017 survey from Charles Schwab,  Himebaugh noted that 52% of participants indicated they don’t have the time, interest or knowledge to manage their 401k portfolio. Additionally, 56% indicated they either aren’t aware or don’t review plan-related education material.

For this reason, he recommended using one fund manager in each of the major asset classes, as well as the creation of model options that make investing simple and easy for employees.

While involving a 3(38) ERISA manager means the sponsor and advisor can outsource their fiduciary responsibility, there’s a catch, according to Rosenbaum, and resides in the wording of “…if an investment manager is properly appointed.”

Plan sponsors still must approve the 3(38)-investment manager, and properly document the due diligence involved in doing so, something that too many plan sponsors fail to realize and another reason the hiring of an ERISA attorney is recommended.

Exit mobile version