Why Missing 401(k) Participants Are So Misunderstood

Missing 401k Participants

Image credit: © Photomo | Dreamstime.com

Winston Churchill, referring to the intentions of the former Soviet Union, stated: “it is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.” For 401(k) plan sponsors, that’s an apt description for the problem of missing participants.  

Unfortunately, “missing participants” is a label for a problem that’s ill-defined and poorly understood, and where fundamental misunderstandings exist, inadequate solutions—paired with the prospect of unwanted regulatory attention or audits—can persist.

Here’s how you can better understand the problem and free yourself from the missing participant treadmill.

A working definition of missing participants

Simply stated, a missing participant has had their linkage to a plan account broken.

Thomas Hawkins

This breakage can occur because of:

If proactive measures are not taken, evidence of missing participants spontaneously arises when:

Sources of confusion and clarity

Common sources of confusion surrounding the topic of missing participants include:

Data from a large plan sponsor suggests that over 10% of requested distribution checks, for whatever reason, go uncashed, despite confirmation of a correct mailing address. To no one’s surprise, people can be fickle, and being unresponsive does not necessarily equate to going missing. By contrast, when distribution checks are not requested, such as forced cashouts of balances under $1,000, a much more significant percentage of these checks will go uncashed, and the bulk of those uncashed items are due to an incorrect mailing address.

In its broadest possible definition, forgotten accounts consist of all 401k accounts left behind by terminated participants and could be construed as missing. While terminated participants constitute the largest potential reservoir of missing participants, asserting that 100% of them are “forgotten” is hyperbolic.

However, it is a safe bet that there are millions of participants whose accounts have been subject to a company merger, a change of recordkeeper, or both. These events can easily contribute to participants losing track of their balances and ultimately, going missing.

A 2018 survey of 1,000 participants provided some much-needed clarity to the problem of missing participants when it found that:

Based on the data, missing participants represent a large, persistent problem in our defined contribution system.

Approaching the problem

With these realities in mind, it’s clear that passively waiting for large volumes of returned mail, uncashed checks, or missed RMDs to materialize is a sure-fire way to attract unwanted regulatory attention. That attention often comes in the form of a DOL audit, which can entail expenses, fines, and fiduciary risk.   

Being proactive is a much better approach. Proactive search strategies include:

The most-effective long-term strategy for reducing the incidence of missing participants is facilitating retirement savings portability. Enabling portability means facilitating consolidation both into and out of the plan, dramatically reducing the number of terminated participants—the fertile ground from which missing participants arise.

Three discrete portability programs work together to facilitate consolidation, including:

Getting off the missing participant treadmill

Clearly understanding the nature of the missing participant problem, taking proactive steps to conduct searches, and turning on plan features that promote retirement savings portability are the key steps to getting off the missing participant treadmill.  

When the problem of missing participants is reduced, everyone stands to benefit.   

Tom Hawkins is Senior Vice President, Marketing and Research with Retirement Clearinghouse, and oversees all key operational aspects of this area, including RCH’s web presence, digital marketing, and plan sponsor proposals. In other roles for RCH, Hawkins has performed product development, helped lead the company’s re-branding, evaluated and organized industry data, and makes significant contributions to RCH thought leadership positions.

Exit mobile version