Americans in High-Cost Cities Could See Smaller Social Security Benefits

A brief by the CRR at Boston College draws on arguments that Americans who live in expensive cities could face smaller Social Security benefits due to the program’s formula
San Diego
Image Credit: © Chris Martin | Dreamstime.com

A new issue brief by the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College looks at how high cost-of-living rates impacts Social Security recipients, pulling past research from a November CRR paper on the matter.

The brief notes that even with a recalculated Social Security strategy that replaces a higher percentage of future earnings compared to what a corporate executive would receive, the study settles that rising housing costs in high-cost cities will keep these workers at a disadvantage—albeit a slight one.

The brief draws on arguments noted in the past paper, when CRR researchers Laura Quinby and Gal Wettstein challenged that Social Security’s benefit formula could penalize older Americans in expensive cities. Even if workers earn more, “Social Security’s benefit formula comes into play because less of their income will be replaced when they retire,” the CRR writes in its brief. “On the other hand, wage increases that lag behind surging local house prices have the opposite effect, partly offsetting the penalty with respect to Social Security replacement rates.”

According to the CRR, the decline in the Social Security replacement rate for a typical older household is less than 1% in an area with 10% higher house prices. For example, the research adds that living in the more expensive San Diego rather than low-cost Minneapolis could reduce the rate by 2.4%.

Therefore, the impact of high-cost housing could be “economically small given that the average replacement rate in the lowest cost [metropolitan areas] is 53 percent,” Quinby and Wettstein said in their research.

Even with a small disadvantage, the CRR finds that respondents who live in these affluent areas are working to close the Social Security gap by saving enough in a retirement plan and other long-term savings accounts. Even some homeowners go as far to move out of the expensive housing market, the CRR finds.  

SEE ALSO:

Amanda Umpierrez
+ posts

Amanda Umpierrez is the Managing Editor of 401(k) Specialist magazine. She is a financial services reporter with over six years of experience and a passion for telling stories and reporting news. Amanda received her degree in journalism and government and politics at St. John’s University. She is originally from Queens, New York, but now resides in Denver, Colorado with her partner. In her free time, Amanda enjoys running, cooking, and watching the latest drama show.

Related Posts
ERISA's Next 50 Years
Read More

ERISA’s Next 50 Years

As defined contribution plans have taken over for defined benefit plans over the first 50 years of the landmark legislation, enabling increased access to 401(k)s, more personalization, better use of auto features and retirement income are among the key issues ERISA is expected to face looking forward.
Total
0
Share