Arbitration is an oft-used form of alternative dispute resolution. Two or more parties fail to resolve a disagreement, they may turn to arbitration.
But is it better to litigate or arbitrate?
The answer to this question depends on several factors.
When it comes to arbitrating ERISA fiduciary claims, the situation becomes even more complex. Is arbitration the best solution? Are there any downsides to solving an ERISA fiduciary claim in this manner?
Let’s explore the pros and cons of arbitrating ERISA fiduciary claims.
Is Arbitrating ERISA Fiduciary Claims the Right Move?
There’s no doubt that arbitration offers many benefits over a trial, including:
- Arbitration costs less than going to court.
- Parties receive a decision more quickly than going through a protracted courtroom battle.
- Parties may have some control over the arbitrator, but no control over a judge and jury.
- Arbitration is less formal and more private than trial.
However, arbitration is not appropriate or acceptable in all situations.
Reasons Arbitrating ERISA Fiduciary Claims Might Not Work
Some of the ‘cons’ of arbitration include:
- The decision is final, legally binding, and usually impossible to appeal.
- The lack of publicity may favor one side over another;
- The informal procedures may include little evidence gathering.
ERISA Fiduciary Claims Need Immediate Attention
Whether arbitrating or not, any challenges related to ERISA fiduciary guidelines are not to be ignored. Consult with an experienced ERISA attorney to learn more about your options.
Anne Tyler Hall is owner and principal attorney of Hall Benefits Law.
HBL offers employers comprehensive legal guidance on benefits in mergers and acquisitions, Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs), executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, healthcare reform, and retirement plans. We counsel a wide spectrum of clients including small, mid-sized, and large companies, 401(k) investment advisors, health insurance brokers, accountants, attorneys, and HR consultants, just to name a few. HBL is passionate about advising clients, and we are dedicated to our mission: to provide comprehensive, personalized, and practical ERISA and benefits legal solutions that exceed client expectations.
Prior to forming HBL, Anne Tyler Hall practiced ERISA and Benefits law with Alston & Bird, LLP and King & Spalding, LLP, two of Atlanta’s largest law firms. As a business owner representing businesses, Anne Tyler understands first-hand the importance of strategically-designed, legally-compliant benefit plans aimed at attracting, motivating, and retaining top employees. She also understands the importance of responsive and timely legal compliance guidance to businesses who are in six, seven, and eight-figure Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, or Department of Health and Human Services penalty situations.
In the last five years, the team of ERISA Attorneys at HBL has avoided or abated $80 million in penalties for plan sponsor clients, and for the past six years Hall Benefits Law has been named the fastest-growing boutique ERISA firm in the United States by the Law Firm 500. HBL’s team serves clients in forty states, assisting plan sponsors as they become proactive in their approach to employee benefits legal compliance. Responsive, relationship-driven counsel is the calling card of the Firm.